Well, for me right now, AgriFlex is a program without flexibility. We were pushing for that. We thought before the election that the four parties, I believe, had agreed and had pushed for AgriFlex. But it didn't come out as we thought.
If you go back to 2005 to 2007, there was $1.5 billion, normally, of federal money going to ad hoc programs. It was very inefficient. That's why we pushed for AgriFlex. It could go to fund programs where the need really was. Also, since it's for regional programs, normally it's less countervailable. If you look at the ASRA program, the Americans already tried to countervail it on the hog side, and they never did, because it's a provincial program. That's the reason we were pushing to make it more regional.
I was under the assumption also that it would have been for risk management, for the RMP.