I'd be open to a friendly amendment, providing the focus does not get watered down, and the fact that we have to look at what happened here. It could be in excess of some $200 million that's been lost, and nobody's asking questions, and I think it's our duty as a committee to start asking those questions and to make sure farmers don't lose that money.
Plus, there are major concerns out there about how this money's going to be recaptured and who's going to pay for this. So if we decide to go to Winnipeg, to look through CIGI and the Canadian Wheat Board, and tour their facilities, including the Canadian Grain Commission, I think that would be good for the committee to do. I've done all of that and it is worth our time, but I want to make sure that the focus when we talk about this topic does not get watered down by the other activities we're involved in.