The way I see it is that we have this report that came out of the subcommittee and we should deal with that. If you want to juggle around the order that the subcommittee came up with, that's your prerogative, and I'm hearing that suggested today. Any new items can simply be added to the one that Alex brought up. But right now we're dealing with the report that's in front of us. Everybody's got a copy of it.
When it comes to answering Mr. Lemieux's question about the mechanism, I think we should to try to get a general consensus today on the highest priorities. Sometimes the availability of witnesses will determine that. For example, one issue that we have at the top might have to be moved one meeting because somebody couldn't come, but we'll make sure there are witnesses for one of the other categories that are near the top so we can go on. That's generally how it should work.
I hope that answers your question.
Mr. Easter and then--