I support the motion, obviously, because what Mr. Easter had read earlier basically was talking about funding available for SRMs. Within the call of the SRMs, this motion talks about solutions. And the solutions may or may not, Mr. Chair, involve dollars. They may involve programs that are already funded.
So with that, just as a comment, I support the motion, because it's actually open enough for us to look at solutions. That's what the intent is, to look for solutions and not have a predetermined amount. I believe what you have done, Mr. Chair, is correct. The amount directed in terms of the one proposal that has come forward is substantively different and it talks only about the dollar figure as the solution.
So I would support this motion, and quite honestly, why don't we just call the question on it?