Actually, Chair, the point I was going to make was that my motion is encouraging the government to work with industry to find solutions. What's being proposed as an amendment is a dramatic change. It's proposing the solution, and that's not the aim of this motion at all. It's a great diversion from the motion.
To go to the hog industry, Chair...the initial ask was for a per head payment, but what turned out to be the better solution was programming that we delivered that was not at all related to a per head payment. What's being proposed completely veers away from the motion because it's proposing a solution before we've even worked with industry to find possible solutions to existing irritants.