Well, first of all, I think the motion just recommends to the minister a specific sum. In my opinion, all it does is reinforce the good motion that we had a little while ago and that we all passed.
I can't quite understand why anybody here would be opposed. Why would we oppose $31.70 going to help the industry, which will filter down to the producer? I mean, they can always refuse it.
I understand that when you're in government there often may be a conflict between individual members and the minister's office, but I just don't quite understand why there's even a debate on this. We put it forward and the government rejects it or not. Maybe it comes up with a different proposal or moves it forward. At least it's there and on the record, showing that we're reflecting the opinion of people out in the field. I think we could be voting on this motion and getting on with it.