I need clarification. This is not working. You are telling me that I need unanimous consent to introduce my motion again. Actually, my motion was deferred, I have already introduced it. Frank introduced his motion, no one asked for unanimous consent to discuss it. I introduced mine, so let us discuss it. I do not see how Mr. Lemieux can introduce another motion when we are discussing SRMs and try to superimpose his on mine. I must also say that he is the one wasting the committee's time with his endless motions and points of order. I want a vote on my motion. It is there; I introduced it.
On December 8th, 2009. See this statement in context.