I want to say, Chair, that I'm disappointed that we've blown another meeting by going in circles on motions. The report sits here unfinished. I think it's worth reiterating that we in fact already voted on a very similar motion, Chair. It was my motion to seek different solutions, which I put forward in front of committee a number of meetings ago.
I still haven't heard why Mr. Bellavance feels so strongly that this is the only solution. Actually, I would put a question to him, through you, Chair. Does he feel that there are any other possible solutions to the SRM irritants, and if there are other solutions, why are they not included in his motion? Why is his motion so narrow? Particularly given the track record of the last time an undertaking like this was attempted, by the previous Liberal government, and the results of that undertaking, why is his motion so narrow?