Thank you, James. I appreciate the answer.
When you look at it and first see the number 80%, you say, “Whoa; we should be careful here”, but I think we're being misled by some people saying it's the real number. It's not the real number. You're saying it's the international and the North American market and that the ability to access all the packing plants in the States creates a different scenario.
It shows you how important trade is, obviously, and that's a recurring theme, it seems, as you come forward. As we look at trade and see these new markets open up, there's a concern on the cull calf side that they're not making enough money. We have to figure out a way to get a return back to cull calf guys.
I appreciate some of your suggestions on the AgriStability side. I know that the Saskatchewan agriculture minister brought it up at federal-provincial meetings a little while back. I understand it didn't get a lot of traction, but maybe it will be brought up somewhere down the road. Again, it is a joint responsibility of both the federal and provincial governments.
One other thing I'd like to ask of you guys is what regulations and other things were put in place with BSE, for example, that are now in place and about which, after five or six years, we can say this no longer makes sense, or this makes sense? Perhaps they're barriers now, or adding costs to the industry that farmers aren't getting.