Well, I think there's some middle ground here on this motion.
I want to speak a little bit to your motion. I'm kind of concerned. For one thing, the steering committee is set up to set guidelines. If we start doing stuff here, it kind of throws out the steering committee.
But that being said, I think there are a couple of things. We all want to do the committee report, but I think that with what's transpired here in the last few months and also with what has happened with a lot of farmers, there's a change in the situation. What I would like to see over the next couple of weeks is that we would deal with some of those issues, find out what's happening in the industry, and then say that there are a couple of weeks in April, put a timeline on it for two weeks in April, and do the report. That's what we'd focus on.
So we can get some of this stuff done, get a kind of a sense of what's going on in the industry, and get that done. Then, for two weeks in April, we say we're going to do the report and we get it done, whether we have to do a few evenings or whatever. I think that would be somewhere in the middle. We say we're going to do a report and we're going to have a timeline on it, but we're also going to address some of these issues up front in most of March. I think that's somewhere in the middle.
But I think we should just give direction to the committee on that. If you're going to have a motion here, I don't know.... If we go to the steering committee and change it, I think it's going to cause a bit of confusion.