I think the issue we see with land values is that, when you are operating farm businesses that are growing and that already have a core operation--in other words, to draw a quick and dirty analogy, you've got a corporate farm where you're going from one generation to the next, you're bringing in sons and daughters and grandsons and granddaughters--it's easier to buy incremental assets and to pay the price you need to get adjoining land and adjoining assets than it would be if you came to an agricultural business fresh; you're the first generation, you want to start, and how are you going to start? The minimum required to have a viable commercial agricultural business means you'd have to have a pretty big bank account to stand the downstroke in order not to be over-leveraged in the business.
Where I think the real challenge going forward will be is where you have intergenerational turnover that goes outside the family and where the senior generation is not in a position to want to or be able to finance the incoming generation. That's where the challenge will be, and that's when the push-back on land values and things like that will have to happen.