Why it becomes important is that when a young person is coming into this, they don't have any equity to put in. Why I'd talked about it earlier, to get into a viable farming operation, you're going to be over $5 million. The interest alone on that will eat you up before you even get started, and you'll be done and bankrupt before you can even get your first calf crop on the ground.
So I think I talked about it earlier: you can't afford to borrow it all at once. The older generations, people who are looking to retire, they have all this equity in the land and no cash. It's almost like a reverse house mortgage, which is probably a dangerous topic to bring up now. But they could almost pay the new generation coming in, in that equity, and let the new generation build up equity through their work—kind of phase one generation in and phase another out.
It's simple economics on this. If you can't afford to get into it, then it doesn't even matter what the returns are when you are in it because you can't even get started. I don't think you as a government want to see the big multinationals take this over, but I don't think it should be a bad word to see big, privately owned farms either. We talked about—and I've heard it here a few times—where everybody wants to be able to expand, but then, on the other hand, they're saying they want to keep small family farms.