In my opinion, fixing AgriStability, if it's not functioning, means changing the structure. The reason for it to be there is to provide some kind of support, but obviously it doesn't provide any support, and I think that might be the real reason for it to be there: it's designed not to put any support into farmers' hands.
The reason for that is that maybe they want to encourage farm size to increase and make use of whatever farm income happens to come along as a result of trade. It's trade, as I mentioned, at all costs, but that trade has to come at a profitable level for farming. As was mentioned, costs are high in Canada compared to a lot of other places in the world, and consumers seem to want a cheap product, so there's a conflict between producers, whose interest is in making a fair living, and consumers, who want to buy as cheaply as they darn well please. If so, what do you need us for? You might as well buy your food from some other place.
It comes down to the whole idea of what we want as a national economy, and that has to be fundamental in the minds of our legislators. They cannot be listening to corporate processors, who want to buy cheap milk somewhere else and not support our local producers, which is what we need.