Gentlemen, thank you for taking time from your day to come here. We know time is valuable to you.
First I want to validate all the concerns and emotions that you have expressed today, even your anger that may exist. I certainly sense some of that, not just today but at previous meetings.
We are somewhat conflicted. We hear--and I am trying to be non-partisan, but the fact that I'm sitting on this side asking the question I guess suggests a certain degree of partisanship--compliments about certain programs. Where I become conflicted is that I hear these programs are working and this is great, but then I hear these programs aren't necessarily working; there is either not enough money or the protocols need to be changed.
Getting directly to the question, I find the transition program rather draconian. To bid for the lowest price, in my opinion, is absolutely ridiculous. In the same instance it is lauded by many of you as being an effective program. How would you change that? Can you tell me?
I am concerned that a transition out is a transition into nothing. I mean, not all of you have farms beside the next subdivision that needs to be developed. With reducing farm values and things, how could that be improved?
Mr. Littlejohn, you were speaking vigorously about this. Could I ask you the question, and then Jurgen?