Criteria have already been developed in other countries: Argentina, for example. That does not mean that we have to follow them, but it is still a model that we can study. They export genetically modified crops, such as soy. Argentina has developed criteria that go beyond an analysis of the effects on health and the environment. They have a third criterion. I feel that, when we are developing criteria, it would be prudent for us to contact them to see what they use, how they do it, and whether it works or not.
In terms of the criteria, if each country accepts genetically modified products from such and such a country, and we want to grow them too, there would be no problem. But if two or three countries do not accept them or if it is harmful for producers, we should then use an economic criterion.
But, to answer the question, Argentina has a model, as I said. We could study what they are doing very closely and try to adapt the model they have down there to our needs.