That's a good question, and we've talked about it--in my discussions with Gina and others. As a committee, we could make recommendations to the government as to who would be responsible and whom we might cooperate with. Right now, I don't think it would be right for me to come up with a scenario of how we would do this.
Take alfalfa and wheat. If we allow either of these crops or seeds into the market, how can we be sure it won't be damaging? We could develop the criteria and provide direction to our government. In regard to this idea of science, I understand what you're saying, Wayne. But it's not up to us to decide which science Luxembourg uses, or Bulgaria, which has just banned GE crops, or Russia, which is thinking of banning all GE crops because of experiments their scientists are doing on animals. We could judge them and say this is false science or it's good science, but whatever decision they make, based on their science and their world, we have to live with it. All we're trying to do is make sure we don't release something harmful or put farmers in a position such as the flax farmers found themselves in.