I think it was more other problems within the system that released that onto the market. But be that as it may, the bill proposes to do an analysis of the potential harm to export markets. How do you propose to do that analysis? What are the criteria surrounding that?
The serious issue here, I really believe.... And I faced this in my province with potatoes. We had GM potatoes at one point in time, which did make a difference in terms of the use of chemicals, a substantial difference, but because of public pressure, McCain's pulled them off the market. We can never get into GM potatoes in our area again. But because they made what I say was an emotional decision, not a scientific decision, they damaged our ability to produce and grow and sell that crop forever into the future. When you move away from something concrete that's science-based, which you can calculate and determine, that's a huge, huge step for which we want to think of all the consequences.
So my question is this. How do you do that analysis of potential harm and determine it in some kind of fashion that's just not based on emotion?