No one's arguing that it's the right approach for all commodities. The point is, though, that GM has made a significant contribution to some commodities, and actually to the farm receipts, the farmers, and the agricultural economy of Canada, and this bill affects all of them, not just one or two niche markets.
This affects all of it, and I don't think it affects it the way you think it does. I think you're thinking that we all hope it leads in the direction of producers having control over regulation, but the bill doesn't stipulate any of that, none of it. It just talks about doing a financial analysis of the harmful impact on foreign markets.
There are a lot of questions about that. What will it be based on? Someone does a study and says it's harmful; well, what did you base that on? Was it a widely accepted process that you used to arrive at that conclusion?
There are a lot of problems with this bill, and it doesn't drive the change that you're talking about. I think you're hoping to leapfrog off the bill into the change that you would like to see, but I would argue the bill does not drive it. We've seen in other commodities that the change you're looking for can happen, and has happened, without the bill. The bill will actually adversely affect development of other products.