What I find interesting is that what you've done is you've carved out three products that are very successful because of the way in which they've been developed. The point is that if this bill passed, those three products wouldn't be in place. You've sort of carved them out and said they're very successful; we've had tremendous success here; the industry works very well together; and, oh yes, this bill doesn't apply to those three but to everything else that follows.
I think, just from a point of view of logic and principle, that if this bill had been in place 30 to 40 years ago, those three products would not exist today.
So...