Just a really quick comment: we don't feed the world right now anyway. We produce extremely high-quality food for markets, for the most part, that don't need more food. We succeed because we produce really the best of the lot. We're going for the top 5% or 10%. If we don't go for it, we won't be in business in five or ten years--not because we can't compete against Brazil, but because the fellow in Humboldt can't compete against PAMI's members, who are selling the short-line farm machinery equipment to the Brazilians. At the end of the day, we need to be in that top niche of the food chain. That means, yes, we ultimately are feeding the world, but this is not a concessionary business; this is a highly tuned business. What we need, if we're going to continue in that business, is to be flexible. There's no one-size-fits-all, and that's the fundamental message I'd leave you.
