I guess I would just express a certain amount of caution. The sugar beet example doesn't necessarily provide us with great reassurance that the existing checks and balances are being adequately followed through. The U.S. Supreme Court recently, of course, ruling with two injunctions against the sugar beet GM in the U.S., found that the science-based regulatory approval systems hadn't been followed in themselves.
So I think it's perfectly reasonable to request that this committee establish a certain intent and parameter and the Minister of Agriculture and the Department of Agriculture establish exactly the metrics that need to be followed. I think it's pretty reasonable that those could be established to assess this.