Right, but all I'm saying, Chair, is that at the steering committee it was decided to have the department. But the main committee hadn't read or debated or discussed or voted in or amended...hadn't had any chance to really deal with the report from the subcommittee. In the subcommittee, of course, that would have been one of the first agenda items.
So I think it's good practice, and it's a practice we've been following, actually. It's a good practice that before the schedule is actually locked in or acted upon, the schedule be discussed at the main committee if it's being proposed by a subcommittee.
I'm not suggesting that the subcommittee has to redo the work of the steering committee. I'm not suggesting that. I'm just saying it is good practice that the main committee look at what the steering committee is proposing before it's implemented.