I oppose the amendment, Chair, for this simple reason. Look, Alex is right. The government can handle this proposal, after we have reported it to the House, however it decides to. They can have a study. But for all this law and order legislation we've seen coming forward, has the government done a study on every single piece of legislation?
The proper procedure here is that if and when the government acts on this particular motion, they will then prepare amendments to legislation. I would expect they would have to bring those amendments before either the transport committee or the agriculture committee, and either one of those committees would study the issue at that time. This is just a way of delaying instead of getting something done for farmers. So I think we should move it up; we should pass this motion, and the government will deal with getting legislation together. Then proper procedure would be for the committee to have a quick look at it, and it would go to the House--