I don't quite follow the logic, but I only get five minutes.
We'll go back to CVS, to that system. I'm actually looking at a report prepared by CFIA. It has a lovely chart. The type of establishment is on the top as noted. There are slaughter establishments. We have a lot of numbers. We have the non-slaughter establishments, which are basically the establishments for the ready-to-eat meats or RTEs. The number you actually have for the CVS, according to your chart, is 155.1 FTEs, full-time equivalencies.
Ms. Swan has actually said in the media that recommendation 7 of the Weatherill report has not had the review that Ms. Weatherill recommended. Ms. Weatherill's report was that the review had to be taking place so that you would know how many you required. So how did you manage to come up with 155.1 when indeed you haven't done the initial piece? That was what the minister asked Ms. Weatherill to do: to do the report. They accepted the report and said they would follow through with all 57 recommendations, and you now have a number that says this is the number you need, yet you haven't done what the initial thing is, which is Ms. Weatherill's recommendation 7.