I want to come back to Curtiss.
Overall, on this whole discussion, one of the things that has me concerned is how we stack up against the rest of the world. Are we, as a country, going to support our producers equivalent to other producer support in the world, or are we not? Otherwise, we're going to fall behind.
I come back to the bare land value and your comments, Curtiss. As I understand it--and I have several Farm Credit Corporation cases myself right now--you could have an operation or land values at $400,000 and Farm Credit will not restructure with the current operator. They'd rather take the chance on selling that out, even if you can get financing to purchase that operation at the bare land value.
I find Farm Credit is more interested in putting people on the market than they are in keeping them on the farm. It's a huge problem.
You said, in your case, that you're in the top 5% of producers. You're an efficient operation. You have market problems, etc., that put you where you are, and the other things you mentioned.
Is Farm Credit of assistance in keeping guys on the land, or are they not, in terms of that kind of proposal?