I listed a few things earlier. Obviously, a program that does not take into account production costs cannot really do what we would want it to.
Something else that was mentioned earlier, an Olympic average is very short. You need to increase the number of reference years in order to prevent the yo-yo or roller-coaster effect. We need to keep things on a more even keel. Now we can see a big problem in terms of the viability test. Would it be possible to make changes on that front? That is another problem that needs to be addressed. And you also have negative margins. At what point can you say that a farm is no longer viable? It can change very quickly, as we have seen. Those are the three areas where change is necessary.
Some provinces may consider other types of programs to address major challenges. For instance, the farm income stabilization insurance program in Quebec and the risk management program in Ontario.