Mr. Chair, I have a couple of points and a couple of questions for Mr. Easter. One is that these are two fundamentally different issues. I really think it should be two motions, because I agree with what you just said to Randy. When it comes to the examination of the AgriStability program there are different issues in different provinces. Some provinces, like Alberta, are in charge of it.
When you talk about the CAIS overpayment, I assume you are talking about the old 506 CAIS overpayment. The Province of Alberta obviously topped that up even more and there was a clawback there. So there are different issues across the country, and I think these are two specific ones. I'm not necessarily against either part of your motion, I'm just saying I think they are two very different issues.
I agree with Mr. Hoback that if we are going to look at this we have to make a point to bring in people from across the country from all the different provinces, because there are different issues. You are aware of some of the issues in P.E.I. and there are different issues with the program in Ontario. So I think to do your motion the justice you're looking for, you would have to expand it a little bit. But I'd feel more comfortable if it were two separate motions.