I'm giving more latitude. It's always been intended that the Government of Canada would have the latitude to discuss with the stakeholders--those are the farmers and the railway company--what's in the best interest of all concerned. That's all concerned.
I mean, we needn't re-hash all the arguments back and forth. While we are in a new session, our memory didn't prorogue itself, and we know what the argument.... The point is we know what the issues are and what the debate is here. These farmers came before us indicating a deep concern about their shunt lines being shut down, and frankly what I perceive to be a certain degree of arrogance on the part of the railway lines, or at least indifference to the needs of farmers at the time. The reason for the wording in the motion was not only to make sure that it's investigated, but that the latitude be given to the government to determine what's in the best interest of the farmers. The farmers know it's being investigated, and the railway lines know that they're not necessarily being targeted.