A good part of it is. This is the sort of thing we're trying to figure out ourselves as we participate in this working group. How far can we get with this? I don't think we believe we can get down to the one pound in Canada, at least in a year or a couple of years. I don't think we believe that. But how far can we get? Can we get a 20% reduction, can we get 10%? How much of that 32 can we get back? That's a question that we have in our minds right now. The only honest thing I can tell you is that we don't know at this point until we work through it. I imagine we'll be back here again at some point in the future reporting on that.
I do understand that one of the things that CFIA has committed to is to review the whole SRM policy at some point in the future, and I believe they're talking about 2012. That was a date that was established right at the implementation. It was implemented in 2007, so it's a five-year review. That's on the horizon. Those things are out there.
Part of it is how much cost reduction can we get by making the pile smaller and how much of it can be accomplished by creating some value for it through technologies, through thermal hydrolysis or other things. At this point we just don't know what that mix is going to be.
I think one thing to come back to is the differentiation between the federally inspected facilities and the provincially inspected facilities and why the amount of material in a provincially inspected facility is nearly double. Really, the answer to that is that the renderers, when they accept waste material from a provincially inspected facility--because those federal inspectors are not there on a regular basis--the renderers are treating all waste from provincial facilities as SRM, whether it's SRM or not. Basically what they're saying is that they can't trust or take the risk that what is in that container of waste material might be SRM or not, so they're going to treat it all that way. As we develop the details about how this is delivered, that's something we want to take into account, that these small facilities have a much higher cost to deal with.