I think both issues need to be dealt with but not in the same way, Brian. If you wanted to put an (a) in there: examine (a) the functioning of the AgriStability program and that the committee (b) examine the impact....
I think both questions can be answered quite often by the same witnesses in charge of the program. I think if you deal with them separately--and we talked about this when we wrote the motion, because they do seem somewhat different issues, but it is the same people to a great extent. It's immaterial to me if we split it, but I just think we simplify our work as a committee--that's all we're trying to do--if we leave it together as (a) and (b) or the way it's written.