I only have five minutes. That seems odd, because in 2007, Mr. Christian Lacasse, who was president of the UPA, walked the corridors at the WTO. He was the one defending supply management, whereas the Government of Canada was prepared to abandon it.
If I'm not mistaken, in February of this year you said that it was to Canada's advantage to quickly conclude the WTO, including for agriculture, because there were substantial gains to make in other areas. I am having trouble understanding that you want to defend supply management, but that you are perhaps prepared to set it aside in favour of the oil sector, for example, or western beef, or things like that.
I want to understand why you have chosen to defend supply management and to not defend it at the same time.