I think that's happened over a long period of time. Certainly the European Union and the United States have a lot of resources at their disposal to provide support to agriculture, and have done so with enthusiasm over the years. What the U.S. and the EU have done in particular, particularly in the EU case, is move away from systems of price support, by and large, and moved more in the direction of direct payments, that are considered to be less trade-distorting than price support. This has given the EU the flexibility to offer reductions in subsidies of 80% to 85%, trade-distorting subsidies at the WTO; in the U.S., it's 70% or so.
It was actually a Canadian idea that would have countries like the EU and the U.S. cut their subsidies by a much greater percentage and margin than Canada would have to do. That idea has been accepted. That was a significant gain on our part.