A costing review would certainly reveal whether our numbers are reasonable or correct. We believe they are. This is the second time we've had Mr. Edsforth look at rail costing. This last report is actually an update of that. That's something a costing review would certainly reveal.
It seems that the railways don't want regulation, but they don't want competition either. As Mr. Banack said, back in 2000, in the Kroeger report, it was hoped that competitive factors would bring those efficiencies back to farmers. But when a competitive issue was brought forward for common running rights so that another carrier could provide competition on major rail lines, the railways lobbied against it. In fact, there was an application made to the CTA to allow for that and it was dismissed.
So in the absence of competitive factors, the only way to drive those efficiencies back to farmers is through regulation. A costing review would certainly achieve that.