I have one question first, Humphrey. You made the point earlier that if penalties were applied for non-compliance--let's say that the railways pay penalties for not having cars in place in time--the railways would in effect be protected by the railway cap, because it would only be trading dollars from within and that kind of thing. You also tied that to 50- or 100-car spots.
Can you expand on that? I think that is a critical question, because if penalties are applied, they should be penalties; they should not just get the money back in another way under the railway cap.