Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Thank you for being here today.
I think we've got a fairly wide divergence of opinion here. We've got both sides of the argument, and that's kind of an interesting way of setting up a panel. It's nice to see both sides of the argument, I guess, for lack of a better way of putting it.
I'm going to ask you both, and I'll start first with CropLife and whoever would like to take the question, to sort of respond to something from the other side of the argument and I would just challenge you a little bit to think about how you would counter the other side's point of view.
I'll start with CropLife. On Tuesday, we had—I forget the university he was with—a Mr. Mauro, who had done fairly extensive studies with Roundup Ready wheat. He discussed that in quite a bit of detail. I think it's mentioned again today by Ms. Sharratt, and it's certainly in her brief as well. There is some discussion about it.
I would ask you to respond and offer your comments on the comments that have been made in terms of Roundup Ready wheat and some of the concerns around it. How would you respond to those kinds of comments, and what would your comments on them be?