If I may also respond to your question about this issue of safety, by bringing forward a critique or recommendations for improving the system for evaluating safety, we're not necessarily saying that the crops on the shelves now are not safe. That hasn't been said. New studies arising that point to potential problems are just valid scientific inquiry that needs to be pursued. There's such little publicly funded or independent science that studies warranting review are emerging just here and there. When we look at the science or this idea that Health Canada is reviewing any new science coming up, that's an assumption on our part, because that's not public information. This is one of the ongoing problems.
The fact that we're now looking at very complex genetically engineered organisms, like pigs.... And Health Canada, in 2005, abandoned the idea of developing new regulations specifically for GM animals. They say they're still developing them, yet there has been already, for a year and a half, an application in Health Canada for approval of a GM pig, for GM animals for human consumption. It's in this area that I think it's responsible to take a look at the evolving scientific knowledge and the evolving complexity of the GE organisms.