Very briefly, the critical piece about this is that we have to ask the question and we have to ask the full question. What we have to do is evaluate exactly what you're talking about. What are the costs and benefits of both pieces?
Again, research for the public good is more likely to do that than commercial research, which is simply going to take the product and make something else to sell. We have to be able to support that fully fledged, completely rounded research and undertake the economic assessment, the biological assessment, and the long-term assessment of the value to the land.
That is part of the critical piece that has to be gotten across: that we're not just stealing one little bit and just doing something quick and dirty and simple. We are actually taking the time and spending the incredible amount of effort that it is going to take to be able to answer your question.