As you know, this meeting is public. Canadians can follow what we're discussing here today. For the benefit of the wider audience, I'd like to engage in a little discussion about the difference between GMO and non-GMO and what would fall under the biotechnology sector.
Professor Vandenberg, you mentioned that if you take a gene or a trait from outside the plant and put it in, this would fall under the GM category, because you're taking something foreign to the plant and injecting it to have better characteristics. If you study a plant's genetic matter and its genes and you see traits that would be worth enhancing, developing, or isolating, that would not be GM. That would be taking what's inherent in the plant and maximizing it to achieve the result you want. Is that a fair description? Do you want to comment on that further?