Was the MIT thing sort of a principle on the government's radar? Do you think that is what drove it in Waterloo? Or was it sort of an initiative that “this is what we've taken as a leadership, and we need to bring in investment, outside of public dollars or taxpayer dollars”?
I am trying to grasp how we do it. I'm not pointing fingers at anyone, because it has to happen. We have fewer people in agriculture. We have a large industry, which means it's becoming much more specialized. People who are in it are extraordinary business people. They're extraordinary innovators. They adapt the research to what meets their needs, not someone else's needs. That works for innovation too.
I'm just trying to grasp how we move there and what we can do to help. I'm open.
John, you look as though you want to say something.
