A point of order, Mr. Chair, on the discussion of the amendment.
Whether I think Mr. Easter is saying something very seriously or not, I don't believe this does change the intent of the motion. If you read the motion, the intent is to place a moratorium on any approval of Roundup Ready alfalfa. There's nothing in the motion that talks about expediency. There's nothing in the motion that says it needs to happen expeditiously. All the motion is saying is that the committee recommends that government place a moratorium.
Mr. Hoback's amendment, as I read it—and I may not have caught all of it—is simply saying that the committee should do its due diligence first, complete the study, and then make that same motion.