I think, from my first glance at this--and I'm going to reread it--that it doesn't change the whole thing. What it does is include it in the study. To go right away from this thing would be a total change in it. I'd like to read it one more time, just to be clear.
I'm still of the same thinking, that this would allow this motion, but in the realm of the report. The only thing is--and this is only a suggestion, because it's not my amendment--that it somehow could be pointed out a little more clearly that it be reported back through the committee. That would maybe clarify it a little more.
As it is, it doesn't make the motion go away or whatever, Mr. Easter; it just includes it in the report. Whether you support that or not, I think it's allowable.
Mr. Bellavance, go ahead.