If I might add to that, I would look at the European example, I guess, as what not to do. They have historically not had a science-based regulatory process with regard to GM material. Technologically, their farmers have, I believe, fallen way behind. They're quickly trying to catch up. Again, the issue of how the EU was going to regulate GM material was decided quite a few years ago. There was no investment going in there, and they are way far behind now in terms of technology development.
We can see them starting to inch forward, seeing the future these technologies have and that they have to start loosening up and accepting these things. We're starting to see movement, I guess, on low-level presence policy in Europe for feedstuff. They are starting to move in that direction. But I think they've done their farmers and their economy a disservice by having a process that is not based on science but is based on political parameters and market acceptance parameters as well.