I'm not aware of an actual diversity assessment, but diversity is not assessed on traditional breeding either. GM is no different, except there's a particular trait in there that was genetically modified. All the other genes in the plant are naturally progressing or recessing, whatever the case may be. There's a lot more to a canola plant than just the GM trait; it's all those other traits in there too. I would propose that there's as much diversity within a GM canola plant as there would be with a traditional one, with the exception of one gene.
There are many other genes in there other than that one. To answer your question, I don't believe this is under consideration in the safety and the environmental assessments, but again that's an area where farmers and the industry have learned to coexist. We have traditional growers out there now. There are not very many of them because the economics for GM production are substantially higher, but again there's still the opportunity for them to grow the system they are comfortable with and make the best money for them on their farm. That's a decision for the farmers to make.