First, I would agree, from the standpoint of moving to the science cluster approach. I think that was very positive. We talk about using resources more efficiently and ensuring that research is coordinated. That was a very good step in that direction.
I think, as Andrea has noted, there were some growing pains in such things as the way the programming is administered and the lack of flexibility in how funding is allocated for research done at AAFC and universities versus for research the Beef Cattle Research Council might be able to direct and steer.
So there needs to be continued work to streamline that process. There needs to be more longer-term predictable funding. And I would suggest that beef cattle and forage research is severely underfunded in this country when we look at the economic contribution the industry makes. Our national check-off agency conducted a third-party study, and the conclusion was that basically check-off funding from the cattle industry that was earmarked for research was providing a 46 to one return on investment, which really points to the fact that investment in that area is underfunded right now in Canada.
I'll ask Andrea to add a comment.