What I'll say is that we're pleased to see him there. I would say in fairness to Mr. Easter's comments, it did seem to take a very long period of time. On the other hand, towards the end of it we said to the government, “You know what? If you're having trouble finding the right person, we're not going to open this act and do this again for 20 years. Maybe we need to wait and make sure we get the right person.” We kind of sucked it up a little bit and said, “Get the right person and do this thing right.”
We're staying in very close touch with the lumber industry, the mining industry, the fertilizer industry, the coal shippers—all the major shippers. We have a very tight coalition, and we're still working together very closely to see this thing move ahead.
We have a fair amount of optimism that Mr. Dinning will be able to help them pull together the model service-level agreements, because without a good service-level agreement, all the penalties will continue to be one-sided and there will be no financial repercussions to the railways for poor service. We simply have to balance the playing field, and this is probably the only reasonable and cost-effective way for shippers of all sizes to see that through.