Again, I look at the fact that there'd be less dependency upon a program like AgriStability, which is certainly something that we don't.... We pay the premiums, but we don't get it, which, again, is probably good because the operation has maintained profitability over the years.
I think it would allow us to.... I'm not trying to say we're going to hoard away money, because our interpretation of AgriInvest is that you manage that money, and you put it away for a rainy day when you do have a cyclical downturn to use it.
As we move forward, with the size of multi-million-dollar operations, it becomes significant in making sure that you've got enough that you can utilize out of that account to get you through those periods. It's worked well at the 1.5%. I think if you can bump that a half a percent or maybe even a little more, it's a situation where it's attractive to put more money in there.
Certainly there are situations with maximums where you have to take it out. I've heard that mentioned; it gets you to your maximum, then what good's the program? Well, guess what? As a farm business operation or any business operation, I think you can manage that. I think that's not a real big task. There are financial instruments and tools to deal with that.
I'll leave it at that, unless you want to—