Since all your examples have to do with the EU, let's talk about it and talk about the current negotiations that are going on. The most basic way is to have the negotiators sit down and try to bang heads over what is feasible and what isn't.
In terms of access for some of their markets and some of our markets, we are never going to have a situation in which we completely open up the markets. They have things that are very sensitive. GM is really more of a consumer issue in the European Union than an issue of protecting producer interests. As long as that is a major issue, they're not going to back off. It is just as it was with the hormone beef, which was also a consumer issue: even though the WTO ruled against them, they ultimately paid the concession so that they did not have to back off. We have to recognize that.
I think we can get access on certain issues, even on non-hormone-treated beef or bison, by attempting to negotiate expansions to the tariff rate quotas currently in place. The U.S. used to share something known as the Hilton quota with us, which limited imports of beef to 117,000 tonnes; they've managed to negotiate considerable access beyond that.
There are a number of avenues we can negotiate, but we have to respect the fact that both sides have sensitivities, and in terms of these negotiations, we're never going to get something that approximates free trade.