Reading the rest of it, I thought that has to be a “not”, not a “now”. It meant the opposite of what your paper said. So thanks.
Let me ask a question on the third bullet point. When we talk about ambitious and comprehensive...and other countries negotiating “next generation” trade deals such as TPP, could you give us a quick overview of what you mean by “next generation”? Are we engaged in next generation or are we still doing—my words, of course—older generation...?