That's good. As I said, I think that's commendable.
A first reaction when you see a reduction in spending by CFIA is that it's somehow bad. Actually, these are good cost savings. They are good initiatives.
I'd also like to talk a little bit about food inspectors. We had this conversation in one of our committee meetings. We were studying Growing Forward 2. We had CFIA here, and then we had Bob Kingston here. In particular, in the discussions with Bob Kingston, I was explaining that there are sometimes areas where perhaps fewer food inspectors are needed on the federal side of things, because we are transferring responsibility to the provinces, which is where they rightly belonged in the first place, but for some reason we have been doing it.
I'm thinking of inspections of some of the provincial slaughterhouses in some of our western provinces. I believe that we're having a look at that and saying that it is actually a provincial responsibility. We're transferring that responsibility back to the provinces, which is where it belonged in the first place. Of course you won't need federal inspectors to continue inspecting provincial slaughterhouses, so you might see a reduction, perhaps, in the number of inspectors. That's not a bad thing. That's simply a transfer of responsibility back to the provinces, where it should have resided in the first place.
I'm wondering if you can comment on some of those changes that might be captured in the estimates.