The criticisms we would like to state concern all the new programs that are implemented, because the standards and rules have to be learned. That comes with time. The results we've managed to achieve and the potential this tool offers are what count above all. There are no real criticisms on the mechanics as such. I'm convinced that minor adjustments will be made as a result of the experience. The important thing is for us to take advantage of the momentum. There has been a quite interesting degree of adherence, of sharing. We've put the Centre de développement du porc du Québec Inc. in touch with the Prairie Swine Centre. These two organizations realized that they were complementary and were reinforcing one another. That's what has to be emphasized: we don't know each other.
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada's researchers have access to research programs specific to Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. However, with a scientific cluster, we don't fit conventional funding models. We're getting these people to think differently and to share information. We're looking for solutions, which means that a number of stakeholders are meeting around a single table for that purpose.
In short, the program I mentioned to you has potential. To take maximum advantage of the momentum, we have to maintain continuity. However, we must have much more funding so that we can meet the demand that has been created.